President Bush has bodily functions? Am I the only one who finds this reassuring?
At least it wasn't a photo of him in the restroom.
By the way, put "failure" in the Google searchbox and click "I feel lucky". Now that is mean.
Friday, September 16, 2005
Sunday, September 11, 2005
Remembrances
Watching this flash film again, my initial reaction was jaded. The memories and emotions flooded back as the movie progressed, but that moment of distance troubles me.
Distance from a historical event is not an evil. It allows more resources and more historical context. We can look back as through a rearview mirror and see the scope of the event, with a readier eye for where we are headed. The years since September 11, 2001 remind us of how united Americans can be as a civilized society, and how splintered we can be across ideological lines.
But rolling ahead with the metaphor: Objects in mirror are closer than they appear. Our perception of distance can lead us to dismiss much of what we understood at the time as archaic, regardless of whether it is as true (or truer) today as it was then. It is easy to become desensitized to ideas as well as images. It is not enough to be bystanders, or actors for some half-forgotten cause. We ought to remember.
Distance from a historical event is not an evil. It allows more resources and more historical context. We can look back as through a rearview mirror and see the scope of the event, with a readier eye for where we are headed. The years since September 11, 2001 remind us of how united Americans can be as a civilized society, and how splintered we can be across ideological lines.
But rolling ahead with the metaphor: Objects in mirror are closer than they appear. Our perception of distance can lead us to dismiss much of what we understood at the time as archaic, regardless of whether it is as true (or truer) today as it was then. It is easy to become desensitized to ideas as well as images. It is not enough to be bystanders, or actors for some half-forgotten cause. We ought to remember.
Leftovers
What happens when a guy procrastinates? He misses things. This time the guy is me. A story catches my eye, I put it aside to cover later, but it sits. So here are the pieces I let slide...
Cathy Seipp wrote an article on Hollywood politics several months after Sept. 11, 2001. Now it serves as a reminder that Hollywood has somehow managed to become more hypocritical, and as documentation of lines like "I think George Bush is a lesbian! A lesbian in a dress! And high heels!"
"When I signed on to the Hundred Years' War, I thought it would be over in 120, 140 tops. Nobody told me we'd be committing for more than two centuries. So I understand the media's impatience. But you know, what looks bad on Day Four doesn't seem such a big deal when you're in Year 137. If I have a criticism, I'd say the media were over-invested in the decapitation approach. For months they pounded the leadership with state-of-the-art precision-guided surgical strikes--Bush is a moron, Rumsfeld's a madman, Blair's a poodle--assuming that, if you remove the nerve centre, the regime will be unable to function. Ha! If there's one thing we French have come to learn, it's that George W. Bush is perfectly capable of functioning without a brain," said Philip VI of France (according to Mark Steyn).
In April, the Family Research Council declared that women are better sick/cancerous than promiscuous.
SpaceShipOne's designer cheered 'small government' initiatives in 1986: "I want to thank Ronald Reagan for providing and maintaining this environment that was devoid of government regulations that would've made this thing impossible in any other country that I can think of. I only filled out two pieces of paper for the U.S. government. I'm serious. We have an application for air-worthiness and an application for the tail number on the airplane."
From July 5th's New York Times: "The spectacle we have made of confirmation hearings reinforces the public notion that the justices exist to decide cases the way political movements want them to. Liberals think the right started it, and conservatives think the left started it, but the important question is not who started it but who is going to stop it."
Do you believe in ghosts?
Do you believe in idiotarians?
An Instapundit reader tackled the notion that Democratic-leaning states subsidize Republican-leaning states: "Since Social Security is the highest federal expenditure, and Medicare is the third largest, it only makes sense that the feds spend more where there are more retirees. Can the red states help it if the Americans who have enjoyed our country the longest choose to retire in Florida, Arizona, and other red states?"
Another Instapundit reader asks, "If we must have [mandatory sensitivity re-education] for racially/ethnically motivated stupidity, why not mandatory patriotism re-education for anti-American or anti-military stupidity?" (Glenn Reynolds' response: "I'm against both, but the door has certainly been opened. And those who are creeped out more by one or the other might ask themselves why.")
Has anyone heard much from John Bolton at the United Nations? The press gave me the impression that he was going to bulldoze the place by now.
The American Center For Voting Rights issued a report stating that during the 2004 elections, "paid Democrat operatives were far more involved in voter intimidation and suppression efforts than their Republican counterparts."
This is like something out of a bad novel.
So is this. What if grasshoppers are only the beginning?
"Prosecuting victimless crimes is a colossal waste of time." Well, duh.
I used to demand boycotts of sweatshop-manufactured goods, until this commentary got me thinking.
John Roberts is likable.
Cindy Sheehan is not. More here, there, this way, that way, and the other way.
America already has Chester Cheetah, but some scientists want us to have real speedy cats on the loose.
Israelis have been giving Jews a tough time.
James Lileks revisited Silent Running.
And since we live in a cynical age, I better close on an ironic note.
Cathy Seipp wrote an article on Hollywood politics several months after Sept. 11, 2001. Now it serves as a reminder that Hollywood has somehow managed to become more hypocritical, and as documentation of lines like "I think George Bush is a lesbian! A lesbian in a dress! And high heels!"
"When I signed on to the Hundred Years' War, I thought it would be over in 120, 140 tops. Nobody told me we'd be committing for more than two centuries. So I understand the media's impatience. But you know, what looks bad on Day Four doesn't seem such a big deal when you're in Year 137. If I have a criticism, I'd say the media were over-invested in the decapitation approach. For months they pounded the leadership with state-of-the-art precision-guided surgical strikes--Bush is a moron, Rumsfeld's a madman, Blair's a poodle--assuming that, if you remove the nerve centre, the regime will be unable to function. Ha! If there's one thing we French have come to learn, it's that George W. Bush is perfectly capable of functioning without a brain," said Philip VI of France (according to Mark Steyn).
In April, the Family Research Council declared that women are better sick/cancerous than promiscuous.
SpaceShipOne's designer cheered 'small government' initiatives in 1986: "I want to thank Ronald Reagan for providing and maintaining this environment that was devoid of government regulations that would've made this thing impossible in any other country that I can think of. I only filled out two pieces of paper for the U.S. government. I'm serious. We have an application for air-worthiness and an application for the tail number on the airplane."
From July 5th's New York Times: "The spectacle we have made of confirmation hearings reinforces the public notion that the justices exist to decide cases the way political movements want them to. Liberals think the right started it, and conservatives think the left started it, but the important question is not who started it but who is going to stop it."
Do you believe in ghosts?
Do you believe in idiotarians?
An Instapundit reader tackled the notion that Democratic-leaning states subsidize Republican-leaning states: "Since Social Security is the highest federal expenditure, and Medicare is the third largest, it only makes sense that the feds spend more where there are more retirees. Can the red states help it if the Americans who have enjoyed our country the longest choose to retire in Florida, Arizona, and other red states?"
Another Instapundit reader asks, "If we must have [mandatory sensitivity re-education] for racially/ethnically motivated stupidity, why not mandatory patriotism re-education for anti-American or anti-military stupidity?" (Glenn Reynolds' response: "I'm against both, but the door has certainly been opened. And those who are creeped out more by one or the other might ask themselves why.")
Has anyone heard much from John Bolton at the United Nations? The press gave me the impression that he was going to bulldoze the place by now.
The American Center For Voting Rights issued a report stating that during the 2004 elections, "paid Democrat operatives were far more involved in voter intimidation and suppression efforts than their Republican counterparts."
This is like something out of a bad novel.
So is this. What if grasshoppers are only the beginning?
"Prosecuting victimless crimes is a colossal waste of time." Well, duh.
I used to demand boycotts of sweatshop-manufactured goods, until this commentary got me thinking.
John Roberts is likable.
Cindy Sheehan is not. More here, there, this way, that way, and the other way.
America already has Chester Cheetah, but some scientists want us to have real speedy cats on the loose.
Israelis have been giving Jews a tough time.
James Lileks revisited Silent Running.
And since we live in a cynical age, I better close on an ironic note.
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
At Least I Don't Live In Monroe, LA*
Forbes has a list of the safest and least safe places in the United States.
For me, the results are not reassuring.
* No offense to the people of Monroe, LA. You would dislike me as a neighbor, anyway. I hear you have lots of big bugs**, and big bugs loose in the home make me scream like a girl***.
** No offense to big bugs.
*** No offense to girls.
For me, the results are not reassuring.
* No offense to the people of Monroe, LA. You would dislike me as a neighbor, anyway. I hear you have lots of big bugs**, and big bugs loose in the home make me scream like a girl***.
** No offense to big bugs.
*** No offense to girls.
Tuesday, September 06, 2005
The Penn Is Mightier Than The Ford
The great American actor/activist Sean Penn (in white flak jacket) and his noble photographer set out to rescue the people of New Orleans...
But something appears to be wrong. Their mighty rescue vessel is taking on water, and the engine won't start! They must paddle back to safety...
Our hero, wielding his legendary Red Cup of Pollution, keeps the team afloat...
Whew!!!
Update: For your consideration.
Update II: From Day by Day:
But something appears to be wrong. Their mighty rescue vessel is taking on water, and the engine won't start! They must paddle back to safety...
Our hero, wielding his legendary Red Cup of Pollution, keeps the team afloat...
Whew!!!
Update: For your consideration.
Update II: From Day by Day:
Thursday, September 01, 2005
Katrina
The situation looks increasingly grim. For those of you here or abroad who would like to donate or volunteer, I suggest the following...
Mercy Corps
Episcopal Relief and Development
For those that like to play blame games while corpses are warm, allow me to suggest you focus your energy where needed most: assisting survivors so that they do not become new fatalities. Exploitation is obviously bad (if not outright bizarre; we might as well go all the way and blame Ronald Reagan for Katrina: his decomposition is releasing greenhouse gases). But prudence is not unwarranted when complaints are valid, either. More probably could have done to impress upon the poor and the illiterate to leave during the evacuation, more people could have offered rides out, the evacuation order could have come sooner, etc., but there will be plenty of time to ready the crosses and nails later. Right now people need help, not recriminations.
Update: James Lileks: "FEMA’s list of charities is here. Note anything about what sort of organizations are doing the hard work? I keep looking for the Objectivist Mutual Aid Society, but it never pops up."
Update II: Don't forget all the little animals: The American Veterinary Medical Foundation. [Edit: Good only for American and Canadian donations. Everyone may donate to the Humane Society of America.]
Update III: By the way, at least a hint of moral support for the U.S. from certain parties might do some good.
Update IV: More on exploitation. (Via Instapundit, who also has a massive roundup of charities)
Update V: The rebuilding of New Orleans is already underway, with the Army Corps of Engineers planning reconstruction from Memphis (scroll down). See a report on Memphis-area relief efforts here.
Update VI: Our troop deployments leave many barracks at home largely empty, so here is a question for those with suitable experience: Why not use U.S. barracks to temporarily house evacuees?
Update VII: Mark Steyn talks to Hugh Hewitt, and nearly blames everybody... namely local, state, and federal governments.
Update VIII: Look, folks, there is more than enough blame to go around. The mandatory evacuation order could have been given two days sooner. New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin could have tried to push buses into service from the very beginning to save lives, and U.S. President George W. Bush could have ordered the armed forces (there are plenty in the U.S. to do the job, they just haven't been called) to be ready to go just as quickly. New Orleans' and Louisiana's governments have known for 40 years that they needed a better levee system, and it is their responsibility (which is probably why Bush is the eighth president to gut federal upgrade funding), while the Army Corp of Engineers is partly responsible for the system that made the flooding so likely in the first place. Congress' spending spree, like the recent $250+ billion highway & transit bill, is taking money away from war and disaster preparation & relief funding we need. And as much as blowhards love to make this a race issue, it is a resource issue--so many people did not leave because they were so poor they did not television or radios to know what was going on, or were illiterate, or simply did not have the ability to flee, and the situation is so bad that even Canada refused to send in a search and rescue team at one point. The list goes on. If you insist on placing blame from the comfort of your air-conditioned home, at least admit that we are looking at bi-partisan and non-partisan stupidity, note that there will plenty of time later to call for heads to roll, and do more to help those in need. Alternatively, consider that everyone in charge is human and is overwhelmingly doing his/her best to set things right, and then do the best you can.
Former President Bill Clinton: Because when you say that they should have done this, that or the other thing first, you can look at that problem in isolation, and you can say that. But look at all the other things they had to deal with. I'm telling you, nobody thought this was going to happen like this. But what happened here is they escaped -- New Orleans escaped Katrina. But it brought all the water up the Mississippi River and all in the Pontchartrain, and then when it started running and that levee broke, they had problems they never could have foreseen. And so I just think that we need to recognize right now there's a confident effort under way. People are doing the best they can. And I just don't think it's the time to worry about that. We need to keep people alive and get them back to life -- normal life.
Update IX: "We pay taxes for this?!" is the latest complaint I overheard about government efforts. Let us take it as read that Americans are taxed less so that they have more freedom over exactly where their money goes and that the government offers special breaks for charitable individuals and businesses to encourage giving, because non-governmental donations, volunteer work, and trade are more efficient and help more causes than the halls of bureaucracy ever can or ever will. That is why America's federal aid can be comparatively low, but American private charity is unsurpassed. So I hate to say it, but in a sense the complaints are spot-on: Much of what we have seen so far illustrates P.J. O'Rourke's truism, "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." Except this time nobody is having fun in the backseat (nor the front, for that matter). [Edit: I suppose I am now griping rather than helping. Is it contagious?]
Update X: I am going to gripe. This looks bad, JunkYardBlog is on the attack, and The Irish Trojan's Blog blasts FEMA Director Mike Brown. We're gonna need more crosses and nails.
At least there is movement.
Update XI: Proof that nothing changed after Sept. 11?
Sen. Hillary Clinton must like the author's "Katrina Kommission" idea.
Update XII: River City Mud Company has an update on evacuee resources in Memphis, culminating in Theatre Memphis' offer of cheap "The King and I" tickets for storm victims...
Here is an entire blog dedicated to the Mid-South's Response to Katrina.
Free Will digs deeper into Louisiana's [non-]response (and, to a degree, defends FEMA's Michael Brown). So does a Chrenkoff reader.
Chrenkoff himself also offers more crazy quotes. Here are a couple of questions for Rev. Jesse Jackson and Kanye West: Do you honestly believe anyone heading rescue & relief efforts said, "Let's take our time. It's only blacks and deadbeats"? And if you do believe the leaders, inclusive of some of the highest-ranking blacks in American history, are criminally bigoted, why did you not do anything for those in need before the storm hit, and immediately after? You say there is "historical indifference" and that "George Bush doesn't care about black people", so you obviously suspected "poor people and black people" needed more help in advance. You have the connections and the money to do things, yet you concentrated your efforts toward press conferences and photo-ops. After the fact.
Also, Rev. Jackson, here is the definition of 'refugee':
One who flees in search of refuge, as in times of war, political oppression, or religious persecution.
'Refugee' sounds that much more appropriate with you adding political oppression on top of escaping a disaster area. Some could argue that your focus ought to be on showing a way up for all of those individuals with no ground to stand upon, or promoting actual tolerance and pluralism through this tragedy, but I understand why you would rather debate the meaning of a word. Apparently, calling class and ethnicity irrelevant to basic decency makes a person racist. Better for progressives to determine qualifications for providing aid on the basis of skin color, and to knock Lou Dobbs for noting that whites are not the only people in charge.
Update XIII: KatrinaHomes.org is helping those still looking for a shelter without "dome" or "center" in the address. For gay and lesbian (and presumably bisexual and transgender) evacuees, the folks at GayOrbit are discussing lodging. (Via GayPatriot)
A warm welcome and thank you to Tim Blair and readers. Hope you find this site better than dull.
Update XIV: You know those reports of rape and murder at the Superdome? Well, have you ever wondered about fact-checking by the mass media?
Update XV: FEMA's Michael Brown is almost certainly going down for his unmitigated cluelessness, especially after this report, though it should be said that the system itself seems to be the disaster's secondary catalyst (the hurricane of course being the primary catalyst, though you might never guess that by watching the stuffed clothes on CNN). Lots of people require a lesson in federalism.
What does it tell us when it was the most-upgraded levee that burst?
The mayor of New Orleans approves forced evacuations. Presumably, he now also approves the use of buses. A notable comment from this story:
"Bureaucracy has murdered people in the greater New Orleans area," [Jefferson Parish president Aaron Broussard] said on CBS' "Early Show." "Take whatever idiot they have at the top of whatever agency and give me a better idiot. Give me a caring idiot. Give me a sensitive idiot. Just don't give me the same idiot."
Because caring and sensitive idiots like teary-eyed Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco are doing such a brilliant job... Keep the 'caring'/'sensitive', but drop the 'idiot', and perhaps bureaucracy will stop being a murderer and revert to its status of robber & scoundrel.
Major relief organizations refuse clothing donations because of the resources necessary to sort and clean the garments, but if your priorities do not follow those of Teresa Heinz Kerry (after Hurricane Ivan) you can still donate to your local Salvation Army to support their efforts and ensure that a supply of clothes remains available for those in need following Katrina.
Update XVI: Christopher Hitchens offers a twofer on Iraq and Katrina.
Update XVII: Relief is available for people with disabilities. The site looks a bit dodgy--so be careful--but the links I tested were valid.
Mercy Corps
Episcopal Relief and Development
For those that like to play blame games while corpses are warm, allow me to suggest you focus your energy where needed most: assisting survivors so that they do not become new fatalities. Exploitation is obviously bad (if not outright bizarre; we might as well go all the way and blame Ronald Reagan for Katrina: his decomposition is releasing greenhouse gases). But prudence is not unwarranted when complaints are valid, either. More probably could have done to impress upon the poor and the illiterate to leave during the evacuation, more people could have offered rides out, the evacuation order could have come sooner, etc., but there will be plenty of time to ready the crosses and nails later. Right now people need help, not recriminations.
Update: James Lileks: "FEMA’s list of charities is here. Note anything about what sort of organizations are doing the hard work? I keep looking for the Objectivist Mutual Aid Society, but it never pops up."
Update II: Don't forget all the little animals: The American Veterinary Medical Foundation. [Edit: Good only for American and Canadian donations. Everyone may donate to the Humane Society of America.]
Update III: By the way, at least a hint of moral support for the U.S. from certain parties might do some good.
Update IV: More on exploitation. (Via Instapundit, who also has a massive roundup of charities)
Update V: The rebuilding of New Orleans is already underway, with the Army Corps of Engineers planning reconstruction from Memphis (scroll down). See a report on Memphis-area relief efforts here.
Update VI: Our troop deployments leave many barracks at home largely empty, so here is a question for those with suitable experience: Why not use U.S. barracks to temporarily house evacuees?
Update VII: Mark Steyn talks to Hugh Hewitt, and nearly blames everybody... namely local, state, and federal governments.
Update VIII: Look, folks, there is more than enough blame to go around. The mandatory evacuation order could have been given two days sooner. New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin could have tried to push buses into service from the very beginning to save lives, and U.S. President George W. Bush could have ordered the armed forces (there are plenty in the U.S. to do the job, they just haven't been called) to be ready to go just as quickly. New Orleans' and Louisiana's governments have known for 40 years that they needed a better levee system, and it is their responsibility (which is probably why Bush is the eighth president to gut federal upgrade funding), while the Army Corp of Engineers is partly responsible for the system that made the flooding so likely in the first place. Congress' spending spree, like the recent $250+ billion highway & transit bill, is taking money away from war and disaster preparation & relief funding we need. And as much as blowhards love to make this a race issue, it is a resource issue--so many people did not leave because they were so poor they did not television or radios to know what was going on, or were illiterate, or simply did not have the ability to flee, and the situation is so bad that even Canada refused to send in a search and rescue team at one point. The list goes on. If you insist on placing blame from the comfort of your air-conditioned home, at least admit that we are looking at bi-partisan and non-partisan stupidity, note that there will plenty of time later to call for heads to roll, and do more to help those in need. Alternatively, consider that everyone in charge is human and is overwhelmingly doing his/her best to set things right, and then do the best you can.
Former President Bill Clinton: Because when you say that they should have done this, that or the other thing first, you can look at that problem in isolation, and you can say that. But look at all the other things they had to deal with. I'm telling you, nobody thought this was going to happen like this. But what happened here is they escaped -- New Orleans escaped Katrina. But it brought all the water up the Mississippi River and all in the Pontchartrain, and then when it started running and that levee broke, they had problems they never could have foreseen. And so I just think that we need to recognize right now there's a confident effort under way. People are doing the best they can. And I just don't think it's the time to worry about that. We need to keep people alive and get them back to life -- normal life.
Update IX: "We pay taxes for this?!" is the latest complaint I overheard about government efforts. Let us take it as read that Americans are taxed less so that they have more freedom over exactly where their money goes and that the government offers special breaks for charitable individuals and businesses to encourage giving, because non-governmental donations, volunteer work, and trade are more efficient and help more causes than the halls of bureaucracy ever can or ever will. That is why America's federal aid can be comparatively low, but American private charity is unsurpassed. So I hate to say it, but in a sense the complaints are spot-on: Much of what we have seen so far illustrates P.J. O'Rourke's truism, "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." Except this time nobody is having fun in the backseat (nor the front, for that matter). [Edit: I suppose I am now griping rather than helping. Is it contagious?]
Update X: I am going to gripe. This looks bad, JunkYardBlog is on the attack, and The Irish Trojan's Blog blasts FEMA Director Mike Brown. We're gonna need more crosses and nails.
At least there is movement.
Update XI: Proof that nothing changed after Sept. 11?
Sen. Hillary Clinton must like the author's "Katrina Kommission" idea.
Update XII: River City Mud Company has an update on evacuee resources in Memphis, culminating in Theatre Memphis' offer of cheap "The King and I" tickets for storm victims...
Here is an entire blog dedicated to the Mid-South's Response to Katrina.
Free Will digs deeper into Louisiana's [non-]response (and, to a degree, defends FEMA's Michael Brown). So does a Chrenkoff reader.
Chrenkoff himself also offers more crazy quotes. Here are a couple of questions for Rev. Jesse Jackson and Kanye West: Do you honestly believe anyone heading rescue & relief efforts said, "Let's take our time. It's only blacks and deadbeats"? And if you do believe the leaders, inclusive of some of the highest-ranking blacks in American history, are criminally bigoted, why did you not do anything for those in need before the storm hit, and immediately after? You say there is "historical indifference" and that "George Bush doesn't care about black people", so you obviously suspected "poor people and black people" needed more help in advance. You have the connections and the money to do things, yet you concentrated your efforts toward press conferences and photo-ops. After the fact.
Also, Rev. Jackson, here is the definition of 'refugee':
One who flees in search of refuge, as in times of war, political oppression, or religious persecution.
'Refugee' sounds that much more appropriate with you adding political oppression on top of escaping a disaster area. Some could argue that your focus ought to be on showing a way up for all of those individuals with no ground to stand upon, or promoting actual tolerance and pluralism through this tragedy, but I understand why you would rather debate the meaning of a word. Apparently, calling class and ethnicity irrelevant to basic decency makes a person racist. Better for progressives to determine qualifications for providing aid on the basis of skin color, and to knock Lou Dobbs for noting that whites are not the only people in charge.
Update XIII: KatrinaHomes.org is helping those still looking for a shelter without "dome" or "center" in the address. For gay and lesbian (and presumably bisexual and transgender) evacuees, the folks at GayOrbit are discussing lodging. (Via GayPatriot)
A warm welcome and thank you to Tim Blair and readers. Hope you find this site better than dull.
Update XIV: You know those reports of rape and murder at the Superdome? Well, have you ever wondered about fact-checking by the mass media?
Update XV: FEMA's Michael Brown is almost certainly going down for his unmitigated cluelessness, especially after this report, though it should be said that the system itself seems to be the disaster's secondary catalyst (the hurricane of course being the primary catalyst, though you might never guess that by watching the stuffed clothes on CNN). Lots of people require a lesson in federalism.
What does it tell us when it was the most-upgraded levee that burst?
The mayor of New Orleans approves forced evacuations. Presumably, he now also approves the use of buses. A notable comment from this story:
"Bureaucracy has murdered people in the greater New Orleans area," [Jefferson Parish president Aaron Broussard] said on CBS' "Early Show." "Take whatever idiot they have at the top of whatever agency and give me a better idiot. Give me a caring idiot. Give me a sensitive idiot. Just don't give me the same idiot."
Because caring and sensitive idiots like teary-eyed Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco are doing such a brilliant job... Keep the 'caring'/'sensitive', but drop the 'idiot', and perhaps bureaucracy will stop being a murderer and revert to its status of robber & scoundrel.
Major relief organizations refuse clothing donations because of the resources necessary to sort and clean the garments, but if your priorities do not follow those of Teresa Heinz Kerry (after Hurricane Ivan) you can still donate to your local Salvation Army to support their efforts and ensure that a supply of clothes remains available for those in need following Katrina.
Update XVI: Christopher Hitchens offers a twofer on Iraq and Katrina.
Update XVII: Relief is available for people with disabilities. The site looks a bit dodgy--so be careful--but the links I tested were valid.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
It Can Spread Faster Than Butter
Liberty. In response to my post on freedom for Belarus, I received an e-mail from the Students for Global Democracy organization. They offer to "give moral support to dissidents", so not much help in actually fighting tyrants, but it is a start. Check it out.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Terror In Egypt
Extremists targeted civilians in Egypt...
October 21, 1992 - Militants ambush tourist bus, killing a British woman and wounding two British men. The woman is the first foreigner to die in militant-related violence.
February 26, 1993 - Bomb in crowded coffee shop in central Cairo kills a Turk, a Swede and an Egyptian and wounds 20.
June 8, 1993 - Bomb explodes near tour bus on Pyramids Road in Cairo, killing two Egyptians and wounding 22 people, including five Britons.
March 4, 1994 - Gunmen fire at Nile cruiser in southern Egypt, wounding a German woman tourist, who died after being flown back to Germany.
August 26, 1994 - Gunmen kill Spanish boy in an attack on a tourist bus in southern Egypt.
September 27, 1994 - Gunmen shoot and kill one German tourist and wound another in a gun attack in the Red Sea resort of Hurghada. Two Egyptians also killed and another German man died of his wounds after returning to Germany.
October 23, 1994 - Suspected Muslim militants kill a British tourist and wound three in a minibus attack.
April 18, 1996 - Islamic militants shoot dead 18 Greek tourists they mistook for Israelis near the Pyramids.
September 18, 1997 - Gunmen kill nine German tourists and their Egyptian bus driver in a shooting and firebomb attack outside the Egyptian Museum in Cairo's Tahrir Square.
November 17, 1997 - Attackers kill 58 tourists and four Egyptians at an ancient temple near the southern tourist town of Luxor. Six gunmen and three police also die in the violence.
October 7, 2004 - A series of bombings at the Taba Hilton hotel on Egypt's border with Israel, and two beaches further south, kill 34 people.
April 7, 2005 - A probable suicide bomb attack in a bazaar in medieval Cairo kills an American man, a French man and woman and the suspected bomber.
April 30, 2005 - A suicide bomber wounds seven people including four foreigners - two Israelis, an Italian and a Swede - near the Egyptian museum.
July 23, 2005 - Car bombs rock Red Sea resorts of Sharm el-Sheikh and nearby Naama Bay, killing at least 49 and wounding more than 100.
"I didn't know Egypt had troops in Iraq. Otherwise, why would the terrorists target them?" remarked Instapundit reader Sean Fitzpatrick.
October 21, 1992 - Militants ambush tourist bus, killing a British woman and wounding two British men. The woman is the first foreigner to die in militant-related violence.
February 26, 1993 - Bomb in crowded coffee shop in central Cairo kills a Turk, a Swede and an Egyptian and wounds 20.
June 8, 1993 - Bomb explodes near tour bus on Pyramids Road in Cairo, killing two Egyptians and wounding 22 people, including five Britons.
March 4, 1994 - Gunmen fire at Nile cruiser in southern Egypt, wounding a German woman tourist, who died after being flown back to Germany.
August 26, 1994 - Gunmen kill Spanish boy in an attack on a tourist bus in southern Egypt.
September 27, 1994 - Gunmen shoot and kill one German tourist and wound another in a gun attack in the Red Sea resort of Hurghada. Two Egyptians also killed and another German man died of his wounds after returning to Germany.
October 23, 1994 - Suspected Muslim militants kill a British tourist and wound three in a minibus attack.
April 18, 1996 - Islamic militants shoot dead 18 Greek tourists they mistook for Israelis near the Pyramids.
September 18, 1997 - Gunmen kill nine German tourists and their Egyptian bus driver in a shooting and firebomb attack outside the Egyptian Museum in Cairo's Tahrir Square.
November 17, 1997 - Attackers kill 58 tourists and four Egyptians at an ancient temple near the southern tourist town of Luxor. Six gunmen and three police also die in the violence.
October 7, 2004 - A series of bombings at the Taba Hilton hotel on Egypt's border with Israel, and two beaches further south, kill 34 people.
April 7, 2005 - A probable suicide bomb attack in a bazaar in medieval Cairo kills an American man, a French man and woman and the suspected bomber.
April 30, 2005 - A suicide bomber wounds seven people including four foreigners - two Israelis, an Italian and a Swede - near the Egyptian museum.
July 23, 2005 - Car bombs rock Red Sea resorts of Sharm el-Sheikh and nearby Naama Bay, killing at least 49 and wounding more than 100.
"I didn't know Egypt had troops in Iraq. Otherwise, why would the terrorists target them?" remarked Instapundit reader Sean Fitzpatrick.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
Quote Of The Day
In a reply to Roger L. Simon's latest post on Iraq coverage:
Heroism itself has been deconstructed as a contemptible artifact having no place in a post-modern narrative of class struggle and victimology.
Heroism itself has been deconstructed as a contemptible artifact having no place in a post-modern narrative of class struggle and victimology.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Another Reason To Love NASA
They work to feed people:
If Boss and Grunden are successful, their work could make a huge difference to humans living in marginal environments here on Earth. In many third-world countries, says Boss, "extending the crop a week or two when the drought comes could give you the final harvest you need to last through winter. If we could increase drought resistance, or cold tolerance, and extend the growing season, that could make a big difference in the lives of a lot of people."
In other news, "My Very Eager Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas" needs revising.
It's within reach.
If Boss and Grunden are successful, their work could make a huge difference to humans living in marginal environments here on Earth. In many third-world countries, says Boss, "extending the crop a week or two when the drought comes could give you the final harvest you need to last through winter. If we could increase drought resistance, or cold tolerance, and extend the growing season, that could make a big difference in the lives of a lot of people."
In other news, "My Very Eager Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas" needs revising.
It's within reach.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Terror Topics
Prof. Juan Cole says of the Bush administration: "...if they are fighting a war on terror, the enemy is four guys in a gymn in Leeds." Michael J. Totten offers a graphic response.
The enemy Cole dismisses so casually are getting around, but at least he admits the enemy is not us. I say we should send some Iraqi women after them. (Assuming the terrorists are human.)
The enemy Cole dismisses so casually are getting around, but at least he admits the enemy is not us. I say we should send some Iraqi women after them. (Assuming the terrorists are human.)
Tuesday, July 26, 2005
Tuesday, July 19, 2005
A Nice Pair Of Hooters
Update: In the interest of contributing more juvenilia, I hereby suggest that the target consumers for these boxers are optimistic men, novelty lovers, and Bill Clinton.
Sunday, July 17, 2005
Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince
I finished this last night, after 11 hours (including meal and breaks).
For most of the book, the main plot is about searching for a plot: It is basically a murder mystery in reverse, leading up to the shocking, though not terribly surprising, death of a major character. "Half-Blood Prince" also ties up several loose ends from earlier volumes, "Chamber of Secrets" in particular, while providing heavy doses of exposition for the final tome. The rest of the book is the more familiar chronicling of life in the wizarding world, which from a logical standpoint is overshadowed by the growing forces of darkness, but from a dramatic standpoint is therefore no longer as fascinating.
J.K. Rowling's writing improved in some ways, being less gimmicky and continuing her pattern of treating the reader as wiser with each book. At the same time, her style is looser, less interested in providing a tight narrative. I love the book, but several chapters could have used a trim.
Apart from the brutal third act, the book is not as dark as "Order of the Phoenix". Although the deaths pile higher than ever before, there is, as one character opines, a bit more love in the world. And a bit more humor: There are dozens of throwaway gags, with more hits than misses, and the magnificently odd Luna Lovegood returns. Plus Harry does not SHOUT as much, having thankfully learned how to handle some of his angst; indeed, a scene where he calmly yet firmly expresses his loyalties stands out in my mind as one of the most genuinely mature passages in the series--Rowling apparently recognized this too, as she provides a reprise.
Now, how long till book seven?
Buy Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
For most of the book, the main plot is about searching for a plot: It is basically a murder mystery in reverse, leading up to the shocking, though not terribly surprising, death of a major character. "Half-Blood Prince" also ties up several loose ends from earlier volumes, "Chamber of Secrets" in particular, while providing heavy doses of exposition for the final tome. The rest of the book is the more familiar chronicling of life in the wizarding world, which from a logical standpoint is overshadowed by the growing forces of darkness, but from a dramatic standpoint is therefore no longer as fascinating.
J.K. Rowling's writing improved in some ways, being less gimmicky and continuing her pattern of treating the reader as wiser with each book. At the same time, her style is looser, less interested in providing a tight narrative. I love the book, but several chapters could have used a trim.
Apart from the brutal third act, the book is not as dark as "Order of the Phoenix". Although the deaths pile higher than ever before, there is, as one character opines, a bit more love in the world. And a bit more humor: There are dozens of throwaway gags, with more hits than misses, and the magnificently odd Luna Lovegood returns. Plus Harry does not SHOUT as much, having thankfully learned how to handle some of his angst; indeed, a scene where he calmly yet firmly expresses his loyalties stands out in my mind as one of the most genuinely mature passages in the series--Rowling apparently recognized this too, as she provides a reprise.
Now, how long till book seven?
Buy Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Thursday, July 14, 2005
Young Belarus Rallies For Freedom
This sounds promising:
"I am 23 years old. I was 19 when I joined Zubr. I was still a student at the Belarusian literature faculty," said the strong-voiced blonde, sitting in a Minsk cafe.
Shortly after the founding in January 2001 of the Zubr group (named after the European bison found in Belarus' forests) "we carried out our first action -- carrying posters of the disappeared in public," she recalls.
The pictures included those of reporter Dmitry Zavadsky and politician Viktor Gonchar, both kidnapped and, according to the opposition, killed by the authorities.
Since then, Tustsik has participated in a series of "performances" intended to "stir up public opinion."
The group declares its aims as establishing democracy in Belarus.
They are aiming high. Now to keep it up.
"I am 23 years old. I was 19 when I joined Zubr. I was still a student at the Belarusian literature faculty," said the strong-voiced blonde, sitting in a Minsk cafe.
Shortly after the founding in January 2001 of the Zubr group (named after the European bison found in Belarus' forests) "we carried out our first action -- carrying posters of the disappeared in public," she recalls.
The pictures included those of reporter Dmitry Zavadsky and politician Viktor Gonchar, both kidnapped and, according to the opposition, killed by the authorities.
Since then, Tustsik has participated in a series of "performances" intended to "stir up public opinion."
The group declares its aims as establishing democracy in Belarus.
They are aiming high. Now to keep it up.
Wednesday, July 13, 2005
Funding The London Olympic Games
As they should, the Games will go forward despite the terrorist attacks. But Johnathan Pearce at Samizdata made some observations about the power of the state prior to the bombing that are worth noting as Londoners press forward, if only to prevent being hit in the pocketbook on both defense and entertainment. This suggestion seems credible:
Asset-backed securities are an increasingly common source of funding in our capital markets. Even pop star David Bowie, demonstrating the sort of business savvy common in the pop world, has issued bonds using his record sales as collateral. Why not issue "Olympic Bonds" with 20 or 30-year maturities to pay for the Games?
And more good wishes from across the sea, Britain.
Asset-backed securities are an increasingly common source of funding in our capital markets. Even pop star David Bowie, demonstrating the sort of business savvy common in the pop world, has issued bonds using his record sales as collateral. Why not issue "Olympic Bonds" with 20 or 30-year maturities to pay for the Games?
And more good wishes from across the sea, Britain.
Confused?
There may be an explanation:
We appear to be witnessing a new experience of male insecurity and confusion. Half of all men in the research agreed that their role in society is unclear. This ranged from 36 percent of Indian men to a staggering 64 percent of French men."
Likewise, 50 percent of American men surveyed stated they were unsure of their place in society, the report stated.
Personally, I blame Barry Manilow.
We appear to be witnessing a new experience of male insecurity and confusion. Half of all men in the research agreed that their role in society is unclear. This ranged from 36 percent of Indian men to a staggering 64 percent of French men."
Likewise, 50 percent of American men surveyed stated they were unsure of their place in society, the report stated.
Personally, I blame Barry Manilow.
Saturday, July 09, 2005
Friday, July 08, 2005
Chicken Hawks Up
"'But if there are many of these ruffians,' said Merry, 'it will certainly mean fighting. You won't rescue Lotho, or the Shire, just by being shocked and sad, my dear Frodo.'" - J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
As a pejorative referring to someone who supports a war but does not fight in it, might "chickenhawk" be perilously broad?
Because I am, as defined here, a chickenhawk myself, you may take the following cum grano salis, but I take it as something worth writing.
The armed forces are not for everyone, for reasons that may have nothing to do with cowardice or confidence in the fight. People have emotional limitations, or physical limitations, or obligations that, while no greater than their perceived duties as citizens, weigh too heavily on their wills. These people speak out precisely because they acknowledge that they are unable to be soldiers, or sailors, or airmen, or marines, but they do want to contribute. They spread the word, they arrange care packages, they secure the fort at home--all through the belief that this support is preferable to none. Those who put their lives on the line for what is right are the personification of nobility, and I cheer them and argue for them for doing what others, including me, can not or will not. But for what I do, I hope touches those men and women made of stronger stuff than me.
Update: Eve Garrard, writing at Normblog: For we can equally ask of those who were and remain against the war whether they were themselves, in their own or their children's persons, prepared to incur the consequences attendant on that war not having been waged.
As a pejorative referring to someone who supports a war but does not fight in it, might "chickenhawk" be perilously broad?
Because I am, as defined here, a chickenhawk myself, you may take the following cum grano salis, but I take it as something worth writing.
The armed forces are not for everyone, for reasons that may have nothing to do with cowardice or confidence in the fight. People have emotional limitations, or physical limitations, or obligations that, while no greater than their perceived duties as citizens, weigh too heavily on their wills. These people speak out precisely because they acknowledge that they are unable to be soldiers, or sailors, or airmen, or marines, but they do want to contribute. They spread the word, they arrange care packages, they secure the fort at home--all through the belief that this support is preferable to none. Those who put their lives on the line for what is right are the personification of nobility, and I cheer them and argue for them for doing what others, including me, can not or will not. But for what I do, I hope touches those men and women made of stronger stuff than me.
Update: Eve Garrard, writing at Normblog: For we can equally ask of those who were and remain against the war whether they were themselves, in their own or their children's persons, prepared to incur the consequences attendant on that war not having been waged.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
